Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 53101 (KAR)

VADIRAJ ALIAS PUTTAPPA S/O. NARAYAN KOUJALAGI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/102804/2022 · 2026-01-31

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1355 CRL.P No. 102804 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102804 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. VADIRAJ @ PUTTAPPA, S/O. NARAYAN KOUJALAGI AGE. 60 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED ASI, R/O. POLICE QUARTERS, HEALTH CAMP, BETAGERI, TQ. BETAGERI, DIST. GADAG-582102. 2. CHANNAPPA S/O. VEERABHADRAPPA NAYKAR AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. POLICE HEAD CONSTABLE, R/O. POLICE QUARTERS, HEALTH CAMP, BETAGERI, TQ. BETAGERI, DIST. GADAG-582102. 3. DADAPEER, S/O. HUSENSAB MAJALAPUR @ MANJALAPUR AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE, R/O. SHIGLI VILLAGE, TQ. LAXMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG-582210. 4. SHARANAPPA @ SHARANABASAPPA S/O. HOLABASAPPA ANGADI AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE, R/O. MULAGUND ROAD, TEJA NAGAR, GADAG, TQ. AND DIST. GADAG-582103. 5. ANDAPPA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA HANAJI AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. POLICE CONSTABLE, WORKING AT MUNDARAGI POLICE STATION, MUNDARAGI, TQ. MUNDARAGI, DIST. GADAG-582118. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETAN T.LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE) CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.02 17:04:25 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1355 CRL.P No. 102804 of 2022 AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD-580011, THROUGH GADAG RURAL POLICE STATION. …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT REGISTERED BEFORE THE GADAG RURAL P.S. CRIME NO.57/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 306, 109 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF 2ND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, GADAG. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal. The memo reads as under: MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL “In the top noted petition, the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, they seek leave of this Hon’ble Court to withdraw the same. Hence this memo.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 11 SL NO.: 4