Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5309 (BOM)

VICKY ANIL GHOLAP AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

APL/1070/2026 · 2026-08-29

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

88.APL.1070.2026.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1070 OF 2026 Vicky Anil Gholap and Ors. .. Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................…  Mr. Ramchandra Wagh, Advocate i/by Mr. Udaysinh Deshmukh for Applicants.  Mr. Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP for Respondent No.1 – State.  PSI – Sanjay Baravkar, Chinchwad Police Station. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : AUGUST 29, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Wagh, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Nakhwa, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State. 2. Considering the facts involved in the present case and Applicants’ indictment subsequently in the charge-sheet for offences punishable under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (for short ‘MCOC Act’) and he having 14 antecedents, I am not at all inclined to consider and grant the present Application for quashing by consent of the parties in view of the gravity of the crime having implication over the Society as large. 3. I dismiss the Application outrightly leaving all other rights of the Applicants as available to Applicants open in accordance with law. 1 of 2 88.APL.1070.2026.doc 4. Criminal Application is dismissed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 2 of 2 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2026.08.31 15:22:41 +0530