- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1223 RSA No. 100965 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100965 OF 2014 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. PRABHU JAYANNAGOUDA DODDAGOUDAR, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. MAKANUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115. 2. SMT. SHASHIKALA W/O. YOGESH LINGADAHALLI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WIFE, R/O. KATTALAGERI, TQ: CHANNAGIRI, DIST: DAVANAGERE-581177. 3. SMT. GEETHA W/O. VIVEKANAND SHIRAGAMBI, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WIFE, R/O. MEDUR, TQ: HIREKERUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI M. H. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S. RAMCO INDUSTRIES LTD., KARUR, TQ. RANEBENNUR, R/BY. BY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1223 RSA No. 100965 of 2014 SHRI V. JUTHU KRISHNAN S/O. ULAYANTHA RAJ, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: ASST. ENGINEER, R/O. KUMARAPATNAM, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581115. 2. SMT. BASAMMA W/O. JAYANNAGOUDA DODDAGOUDAR, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WIFE, R/O. MAKNUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI-581115. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GANGADHAR HOSAKERI AND SRI D. M. MALLI, ADV. FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED ON 23.09.2014 BY IIND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, HAVERI SITTING AT RANEBENNUR IN R.A.NO.77/2006 BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND DISMISSING THE SUIT OF PLAINTIFF IN O.S.NO.33/99 DATED 30.06.2006 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) RANEBENNUR BY REVERSING THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.33/99, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1223 RSA No. 100965 of 2014 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal, stating that the appellants and respondents have amicably settled their dispute. 2. The aforementioned memo is placed on record. 3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of appeal, pending I.A.’s, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE ASN /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3