KISHOR NANA KINI v. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SU MAHILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD THROUGH MANAGER SOU KALPANA APPASO AMBULKAR
IA/6667/2026 · 2026-08-31
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5306 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5306 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
varsha 14-IA-6667-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6667 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.6911 OF 2026 Kishor Nana Kini .. Applicant/Petitioner V/S. The Competent Authority And Su Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd Through Manager Sou Kalpana Appaso Ambulkar .. Respondent ------------------- Mr. S.S. Redkar with Krupali Shetty and Nitin Bhoir, Yogesh Rawool and Mrunmayee Phadke, for the petitioner. Ms. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP, for the State. -------------------- CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.
DATE : 31st AUGUST 2026. PC:
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant (original petitioner).
2. By this application, the applicant seeks recall of the order dated 08.05.2026 passed by the Registrar Judicial-I whereby registration of the petition itself was refused on account of failure to remove office objections. The applicant is also praying for condonation of delay in moving application for restoration.
3. For the reasons stated in Paragraphs 3 to 6 of the application, we are inclined to allow the same. 1 of 2 VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Digitally signed by VARSHA DEEPAK GAIKWAD Date: 2026.08.31 17:49:13 +0530
varsha 14-IA-6667-2026.doc
4. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), subject to office objections being removed within two weeks from today.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) 2 of 2