Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010705512022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 42450/2022 Between: 1. ATCHI NARASIMHA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARIU, HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 26-87, B.C. COLONY. NANDIGAMA TOWN, NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLURU MANDALAM, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA SUB- DIVISION, NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandigama vide Proceedings C.No. 07/HS/SDO-NDG/2011, , Dated 07-01-2011 rowdy sheet open against the petitioner and continuing the same on the file of the Nandigama Police Station against the petitioner are illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and contrary to law and violating of Art. 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and 601 and 602 of AP Police Standing Orders and consequently direct the respondents to close the rowdy sheet against the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the copy of the proceedings C.No. 07/HS/SDO-NDG/2011, Dated 07-01-2011 on the file of the 3' and 4th respondents and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Nandigirna vide proceedings C.No. 07/HS/SDO-NDG/2011, Dated 07-01-2011 and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 not to call the petitioners to the police stations of the 4th respondent and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVADASS BALANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEVADASS BALANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.11.2025, this Court, having observed that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, has directed the matter to be posted under the caption “for dismissal” on 14.11.2025. Thereafter, when the matter was taken up on 19.06.2026, there was again no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned by three (03) weeks. 2. Taking into consideration the docket proceedings, this Court is of the opinion that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter, the Writ Petition is accordingly, dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date:10.07.2026 MJA Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 48 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 42450/2022 10.07.2026 MJA