SHRI. PRAJWAL S/O MAHANTESH KALLANNAVAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100224/2021 · 2026-01-14
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53055 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 53055 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:439 CRL.P No. 100224 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100224 OF 2021 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)- BETWEEN:
1.
SHRI. PRAJWAL S/O MAHANTESH KALLANNAVAR AGE 31 YEARS, OCC.
R/O PLOT NO.177, 1ST CROSS, RAMTIRTH NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590016.
2.
SHRI. MAHANTESH KALLANNAVAR AGE 50 YEARS, OCC-RETD, R/O PLOT NO.177, 1ST CROSS, RAMTIRTH NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590016. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NITIN BOLABANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD, THROUGH CEN POLICE STATION, HAVERI-581104.
2.
NEHA D/O. SURESH PURAD AGE-25 YEARS, OCC-SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O.NEAR HEAD POST OFFICE, M.G. ROAD, HAVERI, TQ AND DIST-HAVERI-581104. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1;] SRI RAJASHEKHAR S. ARANI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.13/2020 REGISTERED BY CEN POLICE STATION, HAVERI ON 30/06/2020 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 66(C), 66(D), 66(E), 67, 67(B) OF THE IT ACT AND 354(C), 504 R/W 34 OF
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:439 CRL.P No. 100224 of 2021
IPC, PENDING BEFORE THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM COURT, HAVERI, IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader, has filed a memo along with the ‘C’ report submitted by the Investigating Agency. Therefore, the prayer in the present petition has rendered infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, if the Investigating Agency files any adverse report against the petitioners, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
AC Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 31