Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5305 (RAJ)

BIRAM S/O JAGANNATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4624/2026 · 2026-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13199] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4624/2026 Biram S/o Jagannath, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Palkhanda Police Station Ghatoli District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 148/2025 registered at Police Station Kamekhera District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21,29 of N.D.P.S. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 20 years and he is behind the bars since 20.02.2026. It is submitted that accused-applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him and the co- accused has already been enlarged on bail. It is submitted that the recovery of contraband i.e. smack is 50 grams which is less than the commercial quantity 250 grams. Learned counsel further submits that the conclusion of trial is likely to take a long time and [2026:RJ-JP:13199] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4624/2026] no useful purpose would be served by keeping the applicant behind bars till disposal of the case. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 20.02.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant; that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; that the recovery of contraband i.e. smack is 50 grams is less than the commercial quantity 250 grams and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him/her on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Biram S/o Jagannath, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J SHIVAM-AMAN/58