SMT PARVATABAI PUNDLIK TIDKE SINCE DECEASED v. NATWARLAL CHIMANLAL SHAH
IA/6616/2026 · 2026-08-29
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5305 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5305 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Renuka 9-IA-6616-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6616 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 540 OF 2005 Smt Parvatabai Pundlik Tidke Since Deceased ...Applicant V/s. Natwarlal Chimanlal Shah ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Rohit P. Karhadkar for Applicant. Mr. Nikhil M. Pujari with Mr. Bipin Singh i/b Mr. P. N. Joshi for Appellant No. 2. Mr. Aryavrat S. Dube i/b Mr. S. S. Kulkarni for Respondent. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 29 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) Interim Application No. 6616 of 2026 is filed by the legal heirs of Appellant Nos. 1 and 3 for their transposition as Respondents in the Appeal. All the Appellants in the Appeal have passed away. Legal representatives of Appellant No. 2 are already brought on record and are represented by Advocate Pujari. However, it appears that legal representatives of Appellant Nos. 1 and 3 have engaged another advocate. Only on account of this conundrum, prayer is sought for transposition of Appellant Nos. 1 and 3 as Respondents. Now, all the Page No.
1 of
2 29 August 2026
Renuka 9-IA-6616-2026.docx legal heirs of the Appellants are ad idem that Mr. Pujari can represent them. Accordingly, legal representatives of deceased Appellant Nos. 1 and 3 are permitted to be brought on record as Appellants with a caveat that Mr. Pujari would represent all the Appellants in the Appeal. Necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2) Interim Application is disposed of.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No.
2 of
2 29 August 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 31/08/2026 17:01:11