[2026:RJ-JP:12721] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3671/2022 1. Shahjad Khan Son Of Shri Aziz Khan, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of S-20, Dhanna Das Ki Bagichi, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). 2. Sajid Khan Son Of Late Shri Sabir Khan, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of House No. A-51, Sipahiyon-Ki-Basti, Opposite Fire Brigade, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Shakir Khan Son Of Late Shri Sabir Khan, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of House No. A-51, Sipahiyon-Ki-Basti, Opposite Fire Brigade, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. 2. Shahid Khan Son Of Shri Nasir Khan, Resident Of Sipahiyon-Ki-Basti, Opposite Fire Brigade, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Aamir Khan Son Of Shri Wazir Khan, Resident Of Sipahiyon-Ki-Basti, Opposite Fire Brigade, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Sameer Khan Son Of Shri Wazir Khan, Resident Of Sipahiyon-Ki-Basti, Opposite Fire Brigade, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anutosh Mishra with Mr. Ashish Sharma for Mr. Ashvin Garg. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Mohammad Aslam JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/03/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided [2026:RJ-JP:12721] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3671/2022] on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Taking serious note of the aforesaid factual aspect of the matter, directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners be granted liberty to withdraw the instant misc. petition in order to submit an appropriate application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. before the Trial Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial. 4. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed with the liberty as prayed for. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 5. In case an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is submitted by the petitioner before the Trial Court at the appropriate stage of trial, it is expected from the Trial Court, to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/17