Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5301 (MAD)

Vignesh v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/9892/2026 · 2026-04-21

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 Vignesh No 37 Pillayra Kovil Street Santhanoor Maduranthagam Chengalpattu ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Anaicut Police Station, Chengalpattu. Crime No.204 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, to grant Anticipatory Bail to the above petitioner/accused in crime No. 204/2025 on the file and pending investigation before the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/s. Manjula M For Respondent(s): MR.P.DHILEEPAN, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(1) of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.204 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused, trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused him and his family members, assaulted them and also damaged the property of the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case by the respondent police and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution’s case and, on instructions, submitted that there 12 previous cases, out of which two are under the NDPS Act, one under 302 IPC , one under 307 IPC and others under the Arms Act. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, the petitioner has five previous cases against him, which clearly demonstrates that the petitioner has misused the liberty granted by this Court. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 21-04-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police Anaicut Police Station, Chengalpattu. Crime No.204 of 2025. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. DRL CRL OP No. 9892 of 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis