Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5301 (KAR)

B RAMESH REDDY v. SMT YELLAMMA @ M SHAMALA

WP/6430/2022 · 2026-04-30

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24286 W.P. No.6430/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.6430/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: B. RAMESH REDDY S/O SRI. NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NO.9, 1ST MAIN, GANGANAGAR BANGALORE 560 032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.V. BHAT, ADV.,) AND: 1. SMT. YELLAMMA @ M. SHAMALA W/O SRI. KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT CHUNCHUGATTA VILLAGE BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE 560 062. 2. SMT. VARALAKSHMI @ RAMANI W/O SRI. PACHAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/AT. DOOPANAHALLI 2ND STAGE HAL, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE 560 008. 3. SMT. KOMALA W/O SRI. SHIVKUMAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24286 W.P. No.6430/2022 4. SMT. PADMA W/O SRI. ARUN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND 4 R/AT MALENAPETA HOSAKOTE TOWN BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562 114. 5. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O SRI. KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 6. SATISH W/O SRI. KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. 7. MADHU W/O SRI. KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 7 ARE R/AT NO.2, DOOPANAHALLI 2ND STAGE HAL, INDIRANAGAR BANGALORE 560 008. 8. SMT. LALITHA W/O PULLIYAPPA ALIAS NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT BYALAHALLI VILLAGE ANUGONDANAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 560 067. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KARAN BORAIAH D.R. ADV., FOR R1 TO R7 R8 SERVED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED DECEMBER 23, 2021 PASSED IN EX 53/2017 IN THE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24286 W.P. No.6430/2022 COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE AT ANNEXURE-A. DIRECT FURTHER PROCEEDINGS TO TAKE PLACE IN EX.53/2017 IN THE COURT OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition does not survive for consideration. 2. His submission is placed on record. 3. In view of the said submission, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20