SHRI LIJANGSING v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/73/2026 · 2026-05-03
Kalyan Rai Surana
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5301 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5301 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020002832026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/73/2026 SHRI LIJANGSING W/C KHALASI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED, TUENSANG DIVISION, TUENSANG, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF NAGALAND DEPARTMENT OF PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA.
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PHED NAGALAND KOHIMA 5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED TUENSANG DIVISION TUENSANG NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : LAKNYEI PHOM, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER 04.05.2026 Heard Mr. L. Phom, learned counsel appears for the applicant. Also heard Ms. Pichano, learned Government Advocate appears for the opposite parties. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant, who is the petitioner in the connected writ petition, has prayed for impleading the Additional Chief Secretary and Finance Commissioner, Government of Nagaland, Department of Finance, as respondent No. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence, the said party was not impleaded earlier. Considering the submissions made, the prayer in this interlocutory application is allowed. This Interlocutory Application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant