Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:12276] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2552/2026 Siraj S/o Rujdar, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Kakankhori, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 24/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.319/2017 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 342, 382 and 364-A of IPC, 1860.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Though in the present matter, the petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2026 with criminal antecedent of three cases; however, he has been acquitted in all cases. It is further submitted that the co-accused, Juned has been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.02.2018. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time and on the ground of parity
[2026:RJ-JP:12276] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2552/2026] with co-accused, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Siraj S/o Rujdar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/49