Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5300 (JHR)

KISHOR KUMAR YADAV @ KISHOR YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./570/2026 · 2026-02-03

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2782 --1-- A.B.A. No. 570 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 570 of 2026 ---- Kishor Kumar Yadav @ Kishor Yadav, aged about 19 years, S/o Binod Yadav @ Bindeshwari Yadav, resident of village – Dehbchuasinga (Gangapur), Panchayat – Jarisinga, PO – Orkhar, PS – Rajdhanwar (O.P. – Parsan), District – Giridih, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Advocate ---- 02/03.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No.300 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 308(3), 75(3), 77, 352 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 12 of POCSO Act and Section 66(C) and 66(D) of I.T. Act pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Act, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there against the petitioner of making video of a minor girl. 2026:JHHC:2782 --2-- A.B.A. No. 570 of 2026 5. In the FIR it is alleged that the petitioner has taken the video of the informant and has demanded Rs.1 lakh from the son of the informant and threatened that if the amount will not be paid the said video will be made viral by the petitioner. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 03.02.2026 Sangam/