Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 530 (GAU)

MD HAKIMUDDIN ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/185/2026 · 2026-02-22

Anjan Moni Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010032522026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.A./79/2026 MD HAKIMUDDIN ALI S/O SAYED SAFAT ALI, R/O VILL. NO 1 JAMBARI, P.S. BOKO, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A AHMED, MR A AHMED,U U KHAN,MISS. P M AHMED,MR. M A CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/185/2026 MD HAKIMUDDIN ALI S/O SAYED SAFAT ALI R/O VILL. NO 1 JAMBARI P.S. BOKO DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : AZAD AHMED Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : --23.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the accused appellant. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. The connected I.A has been filed by the accused applicant under Section 430 of the Code of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for suspension of sentence and to release the applicant on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. The accused applicant has been convicted by the Judgment dated 30.01.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingoaon, in Sessions Case No. 116/2017 convicting the accused appellant under Section 307 of IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused applicant submits that the accused applicant failed to file any application before the Trial Court at the time of passing of the conviction order and consequently, he was sent to jail on the very same date by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon. 5. He submits that since the sentence is only for three (3) years and there are Page No.# 4/4 sufficient materials for him to argue his case, he should, at this stage, during the pendency of the connected criminal appeal, be allowed to go on bail by suspending the judgment & order and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon, on 13.01.2026. 6. This Court, after perusing the materials on record and hearing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, is of the considered view that the accused applicant should be allowed to go on bail at this stage by suspending the impugned Judgment dated 30.01.2026 and the Sentence order dated 03.02.2026. 7. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused applicant shall be released upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Kamrup, Amingaon. The impugned Judgment dated 30.01.2026 and the Sentence order dated 03.02.2026 are hereby suspended during the pendency of the connected appeal. 8. In the aforesaid terms, the instant I.A. is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant