KHALID S/O MOHAMMADSHARIF KARIGAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.RP/100229/2025 · 2026-01-21
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52984 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52984 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:707 CRL.RP No. 100229 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100229 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
KHALID S/O MOHAMMADSHARIF KARIGAR AGE 57 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE R/O. SY.NO 56/1, MARUTI COLONY, SHAHU NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590 010.
2.
IMTIYAZ S/O MOHAMMADSHAREEF KARIGAR AGE 48 YEARS, OCC. TAILOR, R/O. SY.NO.56/1, MARUTI COLONY, SHAHU NAGAR, BELAGAVI 590 010. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHEKHARGOUDA NAGANURI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY KHADEBAZAR POLICE STATION, BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH.
2.
SOHAIL MOHAMMADYUSUF SANAWALE AGE 28 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O. H.NO.3626, KHANJAR GALLI, BELAGAVI 590 001.
NOW RESIDING AT : CHANDU GALLI, BELAGAVI-590001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP FOR R1;
SRI. S.H. YADAWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:707 CRL.RP No. 100229 of 2025
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.397 R/W.
SEC.401 OF THE CR.P.C., 1973/SEC. 438 R/W 442 OF BNSS 2023, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT REVISION PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.03.2025 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN IN S.C.NO.107/2020 AND DISMISS THE APPLICATION - U/S 319 OF CR.P.C. FILED BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 302,109 AND 506 R/W SECTION 35 OF IPC AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS (ACCUSED NO.5 AND 6) IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under:
MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
“Herein, the memo on behalf of the Petitioners as under: That, the Petitioners being aggrieved by the order dated 24.03.2025 passed by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi in S.C.No.107/2020 whereby the application under Section 319 of Cr.PC. filed by the Respondent to implead the present Petitioners as Accused No. 5 & 6 for the offences punishable under Sections 302,109 and 506 r/w Section 34 of IPC was allowed have preferred this petition. It is submitted that the Petitioners no longer intends to prosecute the present matter and are desirous of withdrawing the said Petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:707 CRL.RP No. 100229 of 2025
Therefore the petitioners respectful pray that they may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all contentions before trial court, in the ends of justice.”
2. Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 33