SHIVAYOGI S/O KOTRAYYA HIREMATH v. VINAYAK S/O. NAGARAJ DAIVAGNA
CRL.RP/100206/2020 · 2026-01-29
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52954 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52954 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1163 CRL.RP No. 100206 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100206 OF 2020 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
SHIVAYOGI S/O KOTRAYYA HIREMATH AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DODDAPETE, VASTRADAVARA ONI, RANEBENNUR 581115, TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRUTHVI K.S., ADVOCATE)-ABSENT AND:
VINAYAK S/O. NAGARAJ DAIVAGNA AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. GOLDSMITH, R/O. MAHAVEER ROAD, DODDAPETE, RANEBENNUR 581115 TQ. RANEBENNUR, DIST. HAVERI. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE SERVED TO RESPONDENT)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 (1) R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05/08/2020 PASSED BY THE COURT OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI (SITTING AT RANEBENNUR), IN CRL.APPEAL NO.41/2019 VIDE ANNEXURE A IN CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT 1881, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10/04/2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF IIIRD ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR IN C.C.NO.138/2017 VIDE ANNEXURE B IN CONVICTING THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.01.31 11:21:22 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1163 CRL.RP No. 100206 of 2020
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that revision petitioner-accused is unable to comply with the interim order by depositing the balance amount.
2. Placing the submission on record, the petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 32