Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5294 (GUJ)

AAMAD ILIYASBHAI JEDA v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/3392/2026 · 2026-02-20

Ilesh J Vora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/3392/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 3392 of 2026 ========================================================== AAMAD ILIYASBHAI JEDA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: MR SHIVRAJSINGH B RATHORE(10291) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR BHARGAV PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA Date : 20/02/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondent – State. 2. The applicant, by way of this successive application filed under Section 483 of the Code of B.N.S.S., seeks regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-218 of 2019 registered with City “B” Division Police Station, Dist. Jamnagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 325, 324, 504, 143, 144, 147, 148, 149, 506(2) and 323 of the Indian Penal Code Section 135(1) of G.P. Act. 3. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in judicial custody since 2019 and p. 1 R/CR.MA/3392/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026 presently, the U.T.P. custody period is 6 years and more. He further submitted that similarly situated accused have been granted bail by this court and therefore, on the principle of parity, the prayer made by the applicant may be considered. 4. Learned APP has opposed the bail application contending that, the matter is pending before the trial court and most of the material witnesses being examined by the prosecution and therefore, instead of granting bail, let the order for expeditious trial may be passed. 5. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties and upon perusal of material placed on record, it appears that, the chargesheet for the aforesaid offences came to be filed against eight accused persons for the alleged murder, occurred on 25.12.2019. It is not in dispute that, the custody period of the applicant is 6 years and more and till date, there are no possibilities of conclusion of trial in near future. The co-accused having similar role, is being considered by this court. In such circumstances, without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Page 2 of 4 R/CR.MA/3392/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026 6. Hence, the bail application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.I-218 of 2019 registered with City “B” Division Police Station, Dist. Jamnagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands only), with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall: No. Conditions (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week; (d) not leave India without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned; (e) furnish latest address of residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of the trial Court; p. 3 R/CR.MA/3392/2026 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026 7. The authorities shall release the applicant if he is not required in connection with the any other offence. If breach of any above condition is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned shall take appropriate action or issue warrant against the applicant. The bail bond to be executed before the learned trial Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the sessions judge concerned to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. Nothing stated hereinabove, shall tantamount to the expression of any opinion on the merits of this case. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is permitted. (ILESH J. VORA,J) P.S. JOSHI p. 4 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/02/2026 17:12:37