Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5293 (CAL)

PALTU SK. @ PALTU SEKH v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/110/2026 · 2026-02-02

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

02.02.2026 Court No.28 Item No.70 ssi CRM (A) 110 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Jalangi Police Station Case No. 353 of 2025 dated 07.07.2025 under Sections 21 ( C)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Paltu Sk. @ Paltu Sekh …. Petitioner Mr. Jisan Iqubal Hossain …for the petitioner Mr. Saryati Dutta Mr. Sachit Talukdar ..for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that apart from the statements of the co-accused, there is no other material available against the present petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He submits that there are call detail records for calls between the present petitioner and the principal accused. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this is to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)