SANGITA JANARDAN KONDIVILKAR v. DY COLLECTOR (ENC/REM) AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY COMPETENT AUTHORITY-1 SRA AND ORS
WP/11178/2026 · 2026-08-31
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5293 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5293 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
33-wp 11178-26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11178 OF 2026 Sangita Janardan Kondivilkar … Petitioner Versus Dy Collector (ENC/REM) and Competent Authority- 1 SRA & Ors. ... Respondents __________________________ None for the Petitioner. Ms. Shruti D. Vyas, Addl GP a/w. Smt. Savita A. Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Nishigandh Patil for Respondent No.1- Dr. Collector SRA. __________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 31 st AUGUST, 2026.
P.C. :
1. By the present petition, the petitioner is seeking limited reliefs in as much as the petitioner seeks direction against respondent No.1 to hear, conclude and decide the petitioner’s eligibility/ineligibility proceedings arising out of Appeal No.12 of 2024 within four weeks. Prayer is also made for passing a reasoned and speaking order.
2. We do not find any impediment in not granting the present prayer. We direct respondent No.1 to hear the petitioner and Amk 1/2 ARJUN MACHHINDRA KADAM Digitally signed by ARJUN MACHHINDRA KADAM Date: 2026.08.31 17:20:20 +0530
33-wp 11178-26.doc conclude the eligibility/ineligibility proceeding arising out of Appeal No.12 of 2024, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
3. Needless to say that respondent No.1 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order.
4. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 2/2