- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24334 WP No. 17679 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 17679 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.T.P. HITHENDRA, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O SRI. T.D.PARAMASHIVA, RESIDENT OF HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, DONIGAL POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. 2. SRI. T.P.SURENDRA, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O T.D.PARAMASHIVA, RESIDENT OF KESAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, DONIGAL POST, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA H.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MAMATHA, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O LATE SRI. T.S.BHANUPRAKASH, 2. KUM. DEVIKA, AGED 12 YEARS, D/O LATE SRI. T.S.BHANUPRAKASH, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24334 WP No. 17679 of 2022 3. KUM. ANNAPOORNA, AGED 9 YEARS, D/O LATE SRI.T.S.BHANUPRAKASH, THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT.MAMATHA - R1 4. SMT. POORNIMA, AGED 62 YEARS, D/O SRI.T.D.SOMASHEKAR, RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE ALL R/AT C/O P.S. BELLIYAPPA, PWD CONTRACTOR, 4TH CROSS, MALLIKARJUNANAGARA, SAKLESHPURA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. C. SATHISHKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R4; R2 AND R3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY R1) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.08.2022,PASSED ON IA NO.XXIII FILED BY PETITIONERS HEREIN UNDER SECTION 66 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT AND ALSO ON IA NO.XXIV FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN UNDER SECTION 65 OF THE INDIAN EVIDENT ACT, IN OS.NO.11/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE HONEBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT SAKALESHPURA,HASSAN PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATIONS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24334 WP No. 17679 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the suit is disposed of. 2. The submission is placed on record. In view of the said submission, the petition renders infructuous. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1