Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5292 (CHH)

ASHISH KUMAR THAWAIT v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1021/2026 · 2026-03-10

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:11627 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1021 of 2026 Ashish Kumar Thawait S/o Ram Kumar Thawait Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Ranigaon, Tahsil Ratanpur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner. Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Electronics And Information Technology Through Its Secretary (Nodal Agency Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society - C H I P S), Address - Chips Office, State Date Centre Building, Civil Line Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Office Of Collector Section Degs, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Address - Office Of Collector, Degs, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Additional Collector Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Address Office Of Collector, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - District E Governance Society (Degs) District Bilaspur, Through E District Manager, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Address - Office Of Collector (Degs) Branch, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society Chips Through Chief Executive Officer (Ceo), Address - Chips Office, State Data Centre Building, Civil Line Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - The Collector (E Governancne And Information Technology, Degs) District Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi (Gpm) Address Office Of Collector, Gpm District Gpm Chhattisgarh ... Respondents. Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.03.11 16:50:07 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advocate. For Res/CHIPS : Mr. R.K. Kesharwani, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. GA. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 11/03/2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy before the appropriate Authority in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents stated no objection to the aforesaid submission. 3. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay