17-WP-689-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 689 OF 2026 Sanjay Nagari SRA Sahakari Gruha Nirman Sanstha … Petitioner Versus The Chief Executive Officer Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors. ... Respondents __________________________ Mr. Kunal Damle i/b Mr. J.P. Singh for the Petitioner. Mr. Yash Bhat i/b Ms. Ravleen Sabharwal for the Respondent – SRA. Mr. Chirag Balsara a/w Mr. Nikhil Wable i/b Jayakar & Partners for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Ms. S.D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. a/w Ms. V.s. Nimbalkar, AGP for the Respondent – State. __________________________ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 31 st AUGUST, 2026. P.C. : 1. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record a copy of the communication dated 8th April, 2026 received from SRA terminating the appointment of the developer under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. In view of such communication nothing survives for further consideration in this Petition. 2. The learned Counsel for the Respondent No.2 placed on Purti Parab 1/2 PURTI PRASAD PARAB Digitally signed by PURTI PRASAD PARAB Date: 2026.08.31 18:03:18 +0530 17-WP-689-2026.doc record a copy of the letter dated 5th May, 2026 addressed by the SRA to the Petitioner. In the light of the subsequent development, it is open for the Petitioner to take appropriate remedies against the communication dated 5th May, 2026 in accordance with law. 3. So far as the pending rent and arrears of rent are concerned it is open for the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies including approaching the Rent Committee which has been constituted pursuant to the orders passed by this Court. The SRA to proceed further in accordance with law. 4. The Petition is accordingly disposed of. (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Purti Parab 2/2