LALASAB S/O IMAMSAB BAGAWAN v. SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD
WP/103921/2025 · 2026-01-28
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52904 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52904 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1008 WP No. 103921 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.103921 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
LALASAB S/O. IMAMSAB BAGAWAN, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GANDHINAGAR, TQ. BILAGI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVA SHIRUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT: M/S SUNDARAM FINANCE LTD., 21 PATTULOS ROAD CHENNAI-600002, HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT: NO.258, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALURU-560018, REPT. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. N. SHRIDHAR, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BRANCH MANAGER, R/O. NO.258, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD MAIN, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALURU-560018.
2. HUSENABADSHA S/O. MANSURSAB NADAF, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. NO.3, BANNUR, A/P BANNUR, TQ. RAMDURG, DIST. BELAGAVI-591130.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED WITH)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE
ORDER DATED 28/03/2025 PASSED IN EXECUTION PET. NO.199/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT.
BAGALKOT, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT/DHR TO PAY THE STAMP DUTY ON THE ARBITRAL AWARD IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,,
Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1008 WP No. 103921 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed stating that the petitioner does not intend to prosecute the matter, as the petitioner is exploring the feasibility of an amicable settlement, hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
The memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
All I.As. in this writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
JTR CT: UMD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20