Kamireddy Prabavathamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/17489/2026 · 2026-07-05
K Sreenivasa Reddy
Special Leave Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5290 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5290 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 06.07.2026 Date of uploading : 16.07.2026 APHC010333262026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] MONDAY, THE 6th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 17489/2026 Between:
1. KAMIREDDY PRABAVATHAMMA, W/O KAMIREDDY SATYANARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O 1-117, MAIN ROAD, CHILLAKUR VILLAGE, PELLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -
522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT -
517503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PELLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 524129. 5. THE CHILLAKUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CHILLAKUR VILLAGE, PELLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 524412. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHILLAKURU POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 524101. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
2 SRK, J WP.No.17489 of 2026
pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in permitting.
encouraging or failing to prevent the installation/erection of the late Sri Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) statue in the public road/public utility place situated at Chillakuru Village, Pellakur Mandal, Tirupati District, without obtaining permission from the competent authority and in violation of the directions issued by the Honble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.8519 of 2006 dated 18.01.2013, G.O.Ms.No.55, TR and B (R-1) Department, dated 08.04.2003, G.O.Ms.No.18, TR and B (R-1) Department, dated 18.02.2013, and Circular Roc.No.21030/259/2025/G dated 08.06.2025 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith stop the installation/erection of the proposed late Sri Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) statue in the public road/public utility place at Chillakuru Village, Pellakur Mandal, Tirupati District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed with erection of statue of the proposed late Sri Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) statue forthwith at Chillakuru Village, Pellakur Mandal, Tirupati District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the petitioner as proposed respondent-7 in W.P.No. 17489 of 2026, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR HOME
3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3 SRK, J WP.No.17489 of 2026
O R D E R
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“….to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in permitting.
encouraging or failing to prevent the installation/erection of the late Sri Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) statue in the public road/public utility place situated at Chillakuru Village, Pellakur Mandal, Tirupati District, without obtaining permission from the competent authority and in violation of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No.8519 of 2006 dated 18.01.2013, G.O.Ms.No.55, TR and B (R-1) Department, dated 08.04.2003, G.O.Ms.No.18, TR and B (R-1) Department, dated 18.02.2013, and Circular Roc.No.21030/259/2025/G dated 08.06.2025 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith stop the installation/erection of the proposed late Sri Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) statue in the public road/public utility place at Chillakuru Village, Pellakur Mandal, Tirupati District and pass such other order…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj, the learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat . 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Chillakuru Village. She came to know that the respondent authorities were attempting to install a permanent statue of Nandamuri Taraka Rama Rao (NTR) on the road margin of a public road situated within the limits of Chillakuru Gram Panchayat. Grievance of the petitioner is that the proposed installation is being undertaken without obtaining permission from the competent authority and in complete disregard of the statutory provisions governing public roads. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in SLP (Civil) No.8519 of 2006, by Order dated
4 SRK, J WP.No.17489 of 2026
18.01.2013, categorically directed that no State Government shall grant permission for the installation of any statue or the construction of any structure on public roads, pavements, sideways, or other public utility places, and the said directions were made applicable throughout the country.
Pursuant thereto, the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued G.O.Ms.No.18, Transport, Roads & Buildings (Roads-1), Department, dated 18.02.2013, reiterating that no permission shall be granted for the installation of statues or the construction of any structure on public roads, pavements, sideways, and other public utility places. Thereafter, the Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration issued Circular ROC.No.21030/259/2025/G, dated 08.06.2025, directing all Commissioners and local authorities to strictly implement G.O.Ms.No.55, dated 08.04.2003 and G.O.Ms.No.18, dated 18.02.2013, and to take immediate action for the removal of all unauthorized statues, flexies, hoardings, and other structures from public roads and public utility places. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for the Gram Panchayat, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.4 and 5, on written instructions dated 04.07.2026, submits that, as on date, no statue has been installed and that no installation will be permitted unless and until the requisite permission is granted by the Government, based on the recommendations of the Statue Committee headed by the District Collector, i.e. Respondent No.2. The written instructions are placed on record. 5. A perusal of the written instructions clearly shows that no statue has been installed and that, at present, there is no proposal to install any statue on the subject property. 6. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 5 SRK, J WP.No.17489 of 2026
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Date: 06.07.2026. MS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
6 SRK, J WP.No.17489 of 2026
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Writ Petition No:17489 of 2026 Date: 06.07.2026
MS