Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 529 (RAJ)

GIRRAJ S/O REVADMAL v. RAMNARAYAN S/O REVADMAL

CW/9949/2025 · 2026-02-27

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9084] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9949/2025 1. Girraj S/o Revadmal, R/o Sarrafa Bazar, Lamba Pada, Kasba Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Omprakash S/o Revadmal, R/o Sarrafa Bazar, Lamba Pada, Kasba Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ramnarayan S/o Revadmal, R/o Jawahar Ganj, Kasba Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Gopal S/o Revadmal, R/o Sarrafa Bazar, Lamba Pada, Kasba Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Sub- Registrar, Office Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, Dausa (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pulkit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 27/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail any other appropriate remedy available under law. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order(s) to the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. 4. It is made clear that, in the event any other appropriate remedy is taken, the competent court may consider exclusion of [2026:RJ-JP:9084] (2 of 2) [CW-9949/2025] the period during which the present writ petition remained pending, for the purpose of limitation, in accordance with Section 14 of the Limitation Act. (BIPIN GUPTA),J JUBIN /72