- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17159 WP No. 2355 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2355 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: SMT. GIRIJA POOJARTHI W/O LATE KONIMANE KRISHNA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT KATTABELTURU VILLAGE, VANDSE HOBLI, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576230 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR JMPQ + MMP, TALUK OFFICE, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT – 576201. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-576201. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17159 WP No. 2355 of 2025 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA – 576201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO RESPONDENT NO. 1 FOR REGULARIZATION OF THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF THE LAND MEASURING 30 CENTS, ADJACENT TO NEW SURVEY NO.179/9, SITUATED AT KATBELTHUR VILLAGE, VANDSE HOBLI, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT, AS DETAILED IN REPRESENTATION DATED 16.01.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. On 04.03.2026, the following order was passed; “Matter called out. There is no representation for the petitioner. On the previous occasion also there was no representation. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17159 WP No. 2355 of 2025 Re-list this matter on 11.03.2026. If there is no representation of the petitioner on the next date of hearing, petition will be dismissed for non- prosecution.” 3. However, on 11.03.2026, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today. 4. Since there is disinterest on the part of the petitioner in prosecuting this writ petition, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL