RAJENDRA BANDAJI PATIL v. HANUMAN CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD.
CRL.P/100840/2020 · 2026-01-21
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52881 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52881 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:724 CRL.P No. 100840 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION No.100840 OF 2020 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
RAJENDRA BANDAJI PATIL AGE-60 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O- OM SAI BUILDING, VIDYASAGAR COLONY, DATT NAGAR, VISHRAM BHAG, SANGALI, STATE MAHARASHTRA-416406.
2.
ARUN BANDUJI AGE- 64 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O-BHAAT GADDI, MUDHOL, DIST- BAGALKOTE-587313.
3.
MAHANTESH @ MANJUNATH THIMAPPA @ TAMMANNI DESAI AGE- 27 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O-AKKISAGAR, TQ- SAVADATTI, DIST-BELAGAVI-591129.
4.
LAXMAN SUBHASH MORE AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MUNNOLLI, TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591126. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
HANUMAN CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD., CHIKODI, SHAH COMPLEX, NEAR BUS STAND, CHIKODI, REP. BY ITS I/C SECRETARY/ RECOVERY OFFICER, MARUTI DATTU BHOSALE, AGE-42 YEARS, OCC- SERVICE, R/O- JAIN PETH CHIKKODI, DIST- BELGAVI-591201. …RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.27 12:58:57 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:724 CRL.P No. 100840 of 2020
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, CHIKKODI IN CC NO. 2/2019 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Office, after verifying National Judicial Data Grid, noticed that the present petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the disposal of the main matter before the Trial Court.
2. In addition, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the memo praying to dismiss the petition as not pressed. The memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
kcm Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 5