Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52865 (MAD)

Kandasamy v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Thuvarankurichi

CRL OP(MD)/13018/2026 · 2026-07-09

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.13018 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 09/07/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No.13018 of 2026 Kandasamy ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep., By, The Inspector of Police, Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District. (In Crime No.209 of 2026). ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.209 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : S. Manojkumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.13018 of 2026 Sections 296(b), 109, 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023, in Crime No.209 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that due to property dispute, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused severe injury. Hence, the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that due to property dispute, this case has been registered against the petitioner and with regard to the property dispute, a suit in OS.No.102 of 2023 was filed by the petitioner and the same is pending and counter case has also been registered against the defacto complainant in Crime No.210 of 2026 and the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case, and on instructions, 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.13018 of 2026 reported that the injured is still undergoing treatment and the investigation is at preliminary stage and counter case has also been registered against the defacto complainant in Crime No.210 of 2026. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. I have gone through the FIR and also the connected materials. 6.Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner and also considering the fact that the injured is still undergoing treatment, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 09.07.2026 2/2 dss 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.13018 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR,J DSS To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thuvarankurichi Police Station, Trichy District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.13018 of 2026 Date : 09/07/2026 2/2 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis