SRI BHRAMAR KUMAR MAHANTA v. SRI P.K. CHOUWDHURY, IAS (RETD) AND 4 ORS
I.A.(Civil)/635/2026 · 2026-04-28
Devashis Baruah
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5286 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5286 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010096412025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/635/2026 SRI BHRAMAR KUMAR MAHANTA SON OF LATE RUPENDRA NATH MAHANTA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS RESIDENT OF 26 MENALKA APARTMENTS RG BARUA ROAD GUWHATI-781024 VERSUS SRI P.K. CHOUWDHURY IAS (RETD) AND 4 ORS EX-PRESIDENT OF THE GUWAHATI GYMKHANA CLUB GUWAHATI TEA AUCTION CENTRE BUILDING DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:SRI MANTU BORA SON OF LATE MAKUNDA BORA JOINT SECRETARY OF THE GUWAHATI GYMKHANA CLUB MANAGING COMMITTEE BASISTHA BELTOLA TINIALI ROAD DIST- KAMRUPM GHY781028 3:SRI SOURAV MAHANTA HONY. TREASURER GUWAHATI GYMKHANA CLUB MANAGING COMMITTEE RESIDENT OF BASISTHA BELTOLA TINIALI ROAD DIST- KAMRUPM GHY-781028
Page No.# 2/3 4:SRI PRASANTA KUMAR BARUAH SON OF SRI UMESH CHANDRA BORUAH HOUSE NO. 8 SURAJ MUKHI PATH R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI-5 DIST- KAMRUPM ASSAM PIN 781008.
5:THE GUWAHATI GYMKHANA CLUB A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1860 CURRENTLY UNDER SUSPENSION HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GUWAHATI TEA AUCTION CENTRE BUILDING DISPUR GUWAHATI REPRESENTED BY SRI MANTU BORA SECRETARY OF THE GUWAHATI GYMKHANA CLUB MANAGING COMMITTEE
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. B. D. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. M. Hazarika, Sr. Advocate Mr. A. Biswas, Advocate Mr. M. K. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate Mr. R. Gohain, Advocate
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
29.04.2026
Heard Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant. Mrs. M. Hazarika, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A. Biswas, the learned counsel appears
Page No.# 3/3 on behalf of the Respondent No.4 and Mr. M. K. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R. Gohain, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondent No.5.
2. This is an application for condoning the delay of 692 days in filing the connected review petition.
3. This Court has duly perused the grounds and reasons which have been mentioned in the application and there being no objection on the part of the Respondents to the condoning of the delay, this Court accordingly allows the instant application thereby condoning the delay of 692 days in filing the connected review petition.
4. Accordingly, the instant Interlocutory Application being IA(C) No.635/2026 is allowed.
5. The Registry shall register the accompanying review application.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant