Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52838 (KAR)

TOUSIF ISMAYIL TIGADI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/101224/2020 · 2026-01-20

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:542 CRL.P No. 101224 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101224 OF 2020 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: TOUSIF ISMAYIL TIGADI AGE:23 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: AMBEDKAR NAGAR, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BLAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAY K. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH BAILHONGAL POLICE STATION, DIST: BELAGAVI, R/BY ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, AADVODATE GENERAL OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD. 2. LAXMI SHANTAPPA YADALLI, AGE:53 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: HOUSING COLONY, BAIOHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI. 3. ROOPA SHANTAPPA YADALLI AGE:18 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: HOUSING COLONY, BAILHONGAL DIST: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN BAILHONGAL P.S. CRIME NO.131/2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-B REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 376(2)(N), 506 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND SECTIONS 4, 6 OF THE POCSO ACT, 2012 OF THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI AND QUASH Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:542 CRL.P No. 101224 of 2020 THE CONSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN BAILHONGAL P.S.CRIME NO.131/2020 FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 376(2)(n), 506 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND SECTIONS 4, 6 OF THE POCSO ACT, 2012 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) The Office has put up a note stating that, upon verification of the NJDG data, the matter before the Trial Court itself has already been disposed of. Hence, the present petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC, CT:CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 3