Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52830 (KAR)

GANGADHAR S/O TIPPANNA UPPAR v. VASAPPA S/O. TIPPANNA UPPAR

RSA/100398/2015 · 2026-01-27

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:927 RSA No. 100398 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100398 OF 2015 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. GANGADHAR S/O. TIPPANNA UPPAR, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE WORK, R/O. GANDHI STREET, RANEBENNUR-581115, DISTRICT: HAVERI. 2. SMT. GOURAMMA W/O. VASAPPA UPPAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. INDIRA NAGAR-577601, HARIHAR, DISTRICT: DAVANAGERE. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. VASAPPA S/O. TIPPANNA UPPAR, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE AND MASON WORK, R/O. GANDHI STREET, RANEBENNUR-581115, DISTRICT: HAVERI. Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:927 RSA No. 100398 of 2015 2. DANAPPA S/O. TIPPANNA UPPAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: MASON WORK, R/O. 4TH CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, RANEBENNUR, DISTRICT: HAVERI. 3. CHANDRAPPA S/O. DHARMAPPA UPPAR, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: MASON WORK, R/O. 4TH CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, RANEBENNUR, DISTRICT: HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAGADISH PATIL, ADV. FOR R2; SRI P. G. CHIKKANARAGUND, ADV. FOR R3; NOTICE TO R1 SERVED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RANEBENNUR IN R.A.NO.18/2012 AND CONFIRM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.02.2012 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. J.M.F.C., RANEBENNUR IN O.S.NO.256/2009 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:927 RSA No. 100398 of 2015 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed stating that appellants and respondents have settled their dispute. 2. The aforementioned memo is placed on record, which reads as follows: “The Appellants respectfully submits as under:- The Appellants and Respondents have settled the dispute out side of the court. Hence they may kindly be permitted to withdraw the Appeal as not pressed, in the interest of justice and equity. Hence this memo.” 3. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. In view of the dismissal of appeal, pending I.A.’s, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE ASN /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8