Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:3694
BA1 No.575 of 2026 Mohammad alias Judli Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State.
3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No.133 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Section 8/21/29 of N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act pertains only to the co-accused and there is no compliance qua the present applicant. He submits that recovery is only from the co- accused Tauheed and not from the present applicant. He further submits that co-accused Tauheed has been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.08.2025 in the similar offence and on the ground of parity applicant is also entitled to be released on bail.
5. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that co-accused has been granted bail, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Mohammad @ Judli be released
on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
8. Pending application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
14.05.2026 Arti