IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2198 of 2026 Decided on: 27.02.2026 Sunita Anand …….Petitioner Versus State of HP and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Surender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents – State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, learned Assistant Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. As prayed for by learned Counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-1) be considered and decided, sympathetically, by the Department within a period of six weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. This Court appreciates the difficulty of the Department for effecting the transfer of the petitioner during mid academic session but the petitioner can always be transferred out of said station during general transfers and some 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 other incumbent can be posted in her place. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge February 27, 2026 (narender)