Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:670-DB CCC No. 100131 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100131 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SRI. G. SHANKRAPPA S/O. LATE POMPANNA, AGE. 73 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. TORANAGALLU VILLAGE, TQ. SANDUR, DIST. BALLARI-583 119.
… COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. HANUMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. PRASHANTH KUMAR MISHRA, AGE. 38 YEARS, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BALLARI DISTRICT, BALLARI-583 101.
2.
SRI. MD. HARISH SUMAIR, AGE. 28 YEARS, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BALLARI ZILLA PANCHAYATH FORT, BALLARI-583 101.
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.01.22 16:27:11 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:670-DB CCC No. 100131 of 2025
3.
SRI. ANIL KUMAR, AGE. 34 YEARS, THE TAHASILDAR, SANDUR TALUK, SANDUR, DIST. BALLARI-583 119.
… ACCUSED
4.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY A.A.G., DHARWAD.
… PROFORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. KESHAVAREDDY, AAG FOR PROFORMA A1;
SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA A3 AND R4;
SRI. V. SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR A2)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2025 IN W.P.
NO.101244/2025 (GM-RES) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT, PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-E AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:670-DB CCC No. 100131 of 2025
THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN)
1. By an order passed in W.P.No.101244/2025, this Court had issued directions to the concerned respondents to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
2. Learned Additional Advocate General appearing for accused No.1 submits that in compliance with the said direction, an endorsement dated 27.06.2025 has been issued to the petitioner after due consideration of his representation. An affidavit dated 02.07.2025 is filed by the accused No.1 in this regard.
3. In our opinion, the endorsement dated 27.06.2025 amounts to due compliance of the order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the present petition is hereby dismissed.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:670-DB CCC No. 100131 of 2025
It is needless to state that, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said endorsement, he is at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE
VB CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 16