Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52812 (MAD)

Nithishkumar v. State Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP/18919/2026 · 2026-07-17

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 Nithishkumar S/o. Pichandi, No.257, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Vaniyanthangal Post, Kilnachipattu, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2. The Inspector of Police Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. Alex S/o. Ramadass, No.22, Domini Nagar, Kiliyapattu Village and Post, Tiruvannamalai Taluk and District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for SC/ST Cases, Tiruvannamalai to consider and pass order on the petitioner Bail Application in connection with the Crime No.60 of 2026 on the file of 2nd Respondent Police on their surrender and pass orders on merits on the same day and thus render justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): MR.E.SATHIYARAJ For Respondent(s): MR.R.RAJASEKARAN COUNSEL FOR GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU (CRIMINAL SIDE) FOR R1 AND R2 ORDER The petitioner is an accused in Cr. No. 60 of 2026 on the file of the 2 nd respondent police, for the alleged offences under Sections 303 (2), 296 (b), 115 (2), 118 (1), 127 (2) and 351 (3) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 (1) (r), 3 (1) (s) and 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (the Act). 2. In view thereof, the petitioner has prayed that his bail application be considered on the same day. Considering the provisions of the Act, the allegations and factual background, I am of the view that the prayer can be considered. However, the hearing of the bail application shall take place with due notice to the de facto complainant. 3. This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly ordered as follows: (i) The petitioner shall serve advance notice of the surrender petition/bail application on the prosecution as well as the de-facto complainant, intimating the proposed date of surrender; (ii) The respondent police shall also independently inform the de-facto https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 complainant about the surrender and the hearing of the bail petition, including the date and the Court; (iii) The petitioner shall surrender, and the bail application shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law on the same day. 17-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No JER To 1. The Principal District and Sessions Judge cum Special Judge for SC/ST Cases, Tiruvannamalai. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3. The Inspector of Police Mangalam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 4. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. JER CRL OP No. 18919 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis