Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5280 (ALL)

NEETU DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/32160/2026 · 2026-09-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32160 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. It is contended that despite the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khadda, District Kushinagar has recommended for issuance of corrected date of birth certificate on payment of late fee, the respondent No.4-Block Development Officer, Khadda, District Kushinagar is not issuing the date of birth certificate to the petitioner. It is further contended that the respondents are not accepting the late fee in compliance of the order of the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khadda, District Kushinagar, enclosed as Annexure No.4 to the writ petition. 3. In such view of the fact, we dispose off the writ petition directing the respondent No.4-Block Development Officer, Khadda, District Kushinagar to accept the late fee in compliance of the order dated 12.02.2026 passed by the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khadda, District Kushinagar and issue the corrected date of birth certificate to the petitioner within a period of one month from today. 4. It is made clear that if there is any concealment of fact by the petitioner in obtaining the present order, the respondents shall have the liberty to file recall application to recall the said order. September 9, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Prasad Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Neetu Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad