[2026:RJ-JP:12941] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2773/2026 Ramgopal S/o Kanhiyalal, R/o Village Vinayaka, P.S. K Patan Dist. Bundi. (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Dhanraj Meena, R/o Delunda, Keshorai Patan, Bundi (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/03/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the impugned FIR No. 321/2025 registered with the Police Station Keshorai Patan, District Bundi, for the offences punishable under Section(s) 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 352 & 109(1) B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of causing fronto-parietal blow on the head of the injured-Sumit Meena is levelled against the co-accused persons namely Manish and Mahesh. The allegations against the petitioner and the co- accused person Prahlaad Meena that they inflicted injury on the leg of father of the injured i.e. Devraj by pipe. Counsel further submits that indulgence of bail has already been granted to the co-accused Prahlaad by this Court vide order dated 03.02.2026 and the case of the petitioner is at par with that of Prahlaad, [2026:RJ-JP:12941] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2773/2026] therefore, he deserves the same indulgence of bail. Counsel further submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted and only one criminal case was registered which was pending against the petitioner since the year 2000 and the same has resulted in acquittal of the petitioner on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. Counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.12.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail may be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that indulgence of bail has already been granted to the co-accused person Prahlaad and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and only one criminal case has been registered against the petitioner, which is pending since the year 2000 and the same has resulted in acquittal of the petitioner on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties and the petitioner has been in the custody since 15.12.2025 and the trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ramgopal S/o Kanhiyalal arrested in connection with the [2026:RJ-JP:12941] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2773/2026] aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all the dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Shivam-Puneet/19