HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 27322 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 143 out of 185) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Shubham Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri R.P. Patel, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 0052 of 2026, under Section 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Tarwa, District- Azamgarh, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. 5. There is a criminal history of twenty-two cases assigned to the applicant, which stands explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.7.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. The bail application has been opposed but the submissions raised by the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Praveen Agrahari, Shubham Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Satyam Yadav Alias Rishu Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Satyam Yadav Alias Rishu Yadav, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to verification of sureties, with the condition that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 8, 2026 Shalini BAIL No. 27322 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad