- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1309-DB MFA No. 101324 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.101324 OF 2024 (FC) BETWEEN: SRI. K. R. RAVI KUMAR S/O. LATE K. RAMA NAIK, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O: RAMANJANEYA NAGAR, WARD NO.29, DOOR NO.3, T.B. SANITORIUM ROAD, C.B. BALLARI – 583 101. … APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINAY S. KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SAKAMMA @ SAHANA W/O. K. R. RAVI KUMAR D/O. NAGA NAIK, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: HOME MAKER, PRESENTLY R/O: VIMS HOSPITAL, BALLARI, R/O: SHIVAPUR THANDA, HALAGINAVADA POST, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT – 591 222. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH G. PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT 1984, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.01.2024 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BALLARI IN M.C.NO.271/2021 AND ALLOW THE PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1309-DB MFA No. 101324 of 2024 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) 1. Aggrieved by the order passed in M.C. No.271 of 2021, the petitioner therein has preferred this appeal. 2. Today, the parties have filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC, and they pray that an order be passed dissolving the marriage between the appellant and the respondent in terms of the compromise. 3. The compromise petition is taken into record. 4. Both the appellant and respondent are present before the Court and are duly identified by their respective counsel. 5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent that the parties have agreed to the terms of the compromise petition voluntarily, without any coercion or undue influence, and that the appeal may be allowed in terms of the compromise. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1309-DB MFA No. 101324 of 2024 6. For the aforementioned reasons, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent, which took place on 09.07.2007, stands dissolved in terms of the compromise petition dated 31.01.2026. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Sd/- (B. MURALIDHARA PAI) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14