Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52746 (KAR)

SRI PRASHANTH GOVINDAPPA AGASIMANI v. THE MANAGER

CRL.RP/100068/2025 · 2026-01-19

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:526 CRL.RP No. 100068 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100068 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SRI PRASHANTH GOVINDAPPA AGASIMANI S/O SRI GOVINDAPPA AGASIMANI AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT SECTOR NO. 47, HOUSE NO. 18, NAVANAGAR POST,587103 BAGALKOT DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHANNAVEERAYYA S.K., ADVOCATE) AND: THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA, RON BRANCH, REP. ITS MANAGER, SRI DEEPAK R.B., AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, MANAGER OF SBI RON, BRANCH, GADAG DISTRICT 582126. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A.N. SHIRALKAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.397 OF THE CR.P.C., R/W. 401 (438 OF BNSS R/W 442 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CC NO. 732/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JDUGE AND JMFC AT RON AND ALSO RECORDS IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 24/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT GADAG AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 27.07.2024 PASSED BY THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RON AND JUDGMENT IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 24/2024 DATED 30.12.2024 U/SEC 138 OF NI ACT PASSED BY TH I ADDL. PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT GADAG AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION AND ETC.,. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:526 CRL.RP No. 100068 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Case is called out. 2. None appears on behalf of the revision petitioner. Even on the previous occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner, who has challenged the order of conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 3. It is noted that this revision petition was earlier dismissed for non prosecution on 24.04.2025. Since there is no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner, the petition is hereby dismissed again for non prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SMM / Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 35