SHREEDHAR S./O. NARAYAN BHAT v. SUBRAMANYA S/O. SHREENIVAS HEBBAR
MFA/100335/2018 · 2026-01-29
K Manmadha Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52721 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52721 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1119 MFA No. 100335 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100335 OF 2018 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
SHREEDHAR S/O. NARAYAN BHAT AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. TEKKINAGADDE, KATGARKOPPA, SHIRALI-II, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-581320. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. D.J. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SUBRAMANYA S/O. SHREENIVAS HEBBAR R/O. BEELURMANE, KONAR VILLAGE, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-581320.
(RC OWNER OF TVS MOTOR CYCLE BEARING REG. NO.KA.20/K-6056)
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., R/O. DIVISIONAL OFFICE, KAIKINI ROAD, KARWAR, BRANCH OFFICE-1ST FLOOR, NOWKAR BHAVAN COMPLEX, V.T. ROAD, BHATKAL, TQ: BHATKAL, DIST: UTTAR KANNADA-581320. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N.R. KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R1-SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.09.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.249/2016 PASSED BY THE ADDL.
MACT AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC BHATKAL AND THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IS THE INSURANCE COMPANY HENCE LIABILITY BE FIXED ON R-2 AS PER LAW THE TRIBUNAL SHOULD FIXED LIABILITY ON RESPONDENT NO.1 SINCE R1 IS POOR AND UNABLE TO
Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1119 MFA No. 100335 of 2018
PAY THE AWARD AMOUNT HENCE THE RESPONDENT -2 MAY
DIRECTED TO PAY THE COMPENSATION/AWARD AMOUNT OF RS.2,77,217 TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
KGK, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 42