Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52698 (KAR)

SHRI SHANKAR S/O MALLAPPA VIBHUTI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/101514/2022 · 2026-01-22

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:840 CRL.P No. 101514 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101514 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI SHANKAR S/O MALLAPPA VIBHUTI AGE. 74 YEARS, OCC. R/O. HOUSE NO. 46, BAGARPET, OLD HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUSHAL V. BOLMAL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY GOKUL ROAD POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, NOW REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. 2. SRI. BANNAPPA S/O BASAPPA HOSAMANI, AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. PVT. WORK, R/O. KALIDASNAGAR, MOUNESHWARA PLOT, KUNDAGOL, TQ. KUNDAGOL, DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN CC NO.1875/2020 (P.C. NO.261/2015) ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC-III COURT, HUBBALLI, DHARWAD AND QUASH THE P.C. NO.261/2015 DATED 16.04.2015 AND FIR IN GOKUL ROAD PS CRIME NO.27/2016 DATED 10.04.2016 AND THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.1875/2020 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 417, 418, 419, 420, 468, 471 R/W 34 OF IPC, BEFORE THE JMFC-III COURT, HUBBALLI, DHARWAD AGAINST THE PETITIONER HEREIN AS THE SAME BEING TOTALLY ILLEGAL AND NOT SUSTAINABLE IN LAW IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:840 CRL.P No. 101514 of 2022 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. The office, after verifying National Judicial Data Grid, has noticed that the present petition has become rendered infructuous, in view of the disposal of the main matter before the Trial Court. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 8