Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5268 (RAJ)

SMT. ROSHANI DEVI W/O DHALCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1283/2026 · 2026-03-18

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11559] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1283/2026 1. Smt. Roshani Devi W/o Dhalchand, R/o Niwasiyan Churani, Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputli). 2. Dalchand S/o Devaram, R/o Niwasiyan Churani, Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta with Mr. Mukul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 137/2025 registered at Police Station Virat Nagar District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that present bail application is moved jointly on behalf of the husband and the wife, aged about 45 years and 35 years respectively. It is submitted that applicants have falsely been implicated in the matter. It is next submitted that there are mandatory procedural infractions of provisions pertaining to the [2026:RJ-JP:11559] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1283/2026] alleged offence. It is also submitted that till 07.07.2025, the applicants were not even named in the FIR. However, without any tangible evidence, the applicants were arrested on 08.07.2025. Furthermore, it is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicants and that the charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter. It is next submitted that the allegations have been levelled on the basis of recovery of money and financial transactions executed inter se between the victim (deceased) and the applicants. It is lastly submitted that there have been material improvements in the statements recorded before the Trial Court, as compared to the contents of the FIR. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted that a motorcycle and cash have been recovered from the applicants, which support the story of prosecution. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the accused- applicants are in custody ever since 08.07.2025; that charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicants, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicants and enlarge them on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants 1. Smt. Roshani Devi W/o Dhalchand and 2. Dalchand S/o Devaram [2026:RJ-JP:11559] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1283/2026] shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /44