Chidambaranathan v. State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18850/2026 · 2026-07-17
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52672 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 52672 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 Chidambaranathan ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Sirkali Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District. Crime No.229 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in the event of his arrest by the Respondent Police, pending investigation of the case in Crime No 229 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M. Vijayaragavan For Respondent(s): Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 ( 294(b), 323, 326 and 506(ii) of IPC) in Crime No. 229 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5
2. The case of the prosecution is that petitioner and defacto complainant are husband and wife. On the occurrence day, due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioner picked up quarrel with defacto complainant and attacked her and her family members with weapon, thereby they got injured. He also abused them in a filthy language. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been admitted on 30.06.2026 and he has been discharged from the hospital on 01.07.2026. However, she opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5
5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the
submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides and also considering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital on 01.07.2026, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali, Mayiladuthurai District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 proofs to ensure their identity; (c) The petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., and 05.30 p.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No NR To:
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Sirkali, Mayiladuthurai District
2. The Inspector of Police Sirkali Police Station, Mayiladuthurai District.
3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. NR CRL OP No. 18850 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis