Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52666 (MAD)

SUN PROPERTIES v. C.Subramanian

CRP/3888/2026 · 2026-07-20

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRP No.3888 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CRP No.3888 of 2026 SUN PROPERTIES Rep. by its Proprietrix S.Maheswari, No.365, Maragatham Complex, Trichy Road, Sulur, Coimbatore 641 402. : Petitioner Versus 1.C.Subramanian Residing at 48A, Sanjeeviyur, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501. 2. M/s. TMB Bank Elampillai Branch, Rep. by its Manager, No.936/2B, Mettur Road, Near Bus Stand, Ellampillai 637 502. 3. M/s. Kandasamy Coconut Mandy Rep. by its Proprietor Manikandan, 14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501. Page 1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026 4. K.Manikandan 14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501. 5. Dhanalakshmi Arunkumar No.5/100, Kezhaku Kattuvalavu, Kamalapuram, Salem 636 309. 6. Sumathi 14/312, Sanjeeviyur, Surapalli Village, Nangavalli Block, Jalagandapuram, Salem 636 501. 7. Annapoorni Ramesh No.34-1, Eareekaadu, Meyanoor, Alagapuram, Salem 636 004. : Respondents Prayer: Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue direction to the Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, to dispose the SA.No.363 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Coimbatore within a time frame. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Manojkumar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to the Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore, to dispose the S.A.No.363 of 2024 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, at Coimbatore within a time frame. 2. We have gone through the order sheets placed on record and find that the case is progressing. Any direction to expedite a specific case out of turn would disrupt the board of the Tribunal. The petitioner has failed to demonstrate any exceptional circumstance that distinguishes its case from other litigants waiting in queue before the Tribunal. The Tribunal should prioritize cases based on their seniority, nature of urgency and statutory mandate. It is empowered to regulate its procedure and accelerate hearings if a genuine case of urgency is made out. Issuing blanket direction for quick disposal would put undue pressure on the Tribunal and, consequently, the persons who approached the Tribunal earlier would be left at a disadvantaged position. Page 3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026 3. We are, therefore, not inclined to give such a direction to decide the case within a time frame. However, the petitioner would get liberty to file appropriate application before the Tribunal to expedite the hearing. 4. With this liberty, the revision petition stands disposed of. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 20.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No tar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026 To The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Coimbatore https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No.3888 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN , J. (tar) CRP No.3888 of 2026 20.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis