- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:50 RSA No. 100076 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100076 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN: ADIVEMMA, W/O. PURABASAPPA, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, GANDABOMMANAHALLI, SIDEGALLU (PO), KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT, PIN: 583130. …APPELLANT (BY SRI HARSH DESAI AND SRI. M. GURURAJ, ADVOCATES.) AND: 1. HADAPADA RUDRAMUNI, S/O H. CHENNAPPA, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. SIDEGALLU VILLAGE, KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT, PIN: 583130. 2. HADAPADA BASAPPA, S/O. H. KATTEBASAPPA, AGE: 88 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: SIDEGALLU VILLAGE, KUDLIGI TALUK, Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:50 RSA No. 100076 of 2017 BALLARI DISTRICT, PIN: 583130. 3. HADAPADA NAGARAJA, S/O H. BASAPPA, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: SIDEGALLU VILLAGE, KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT, PIN: 583130. 4. HADAPADA KATTEBASAPPA, S/O. HADAPADA GULEPPA, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: SIDEGALLU VILLAGE, KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT, PIN: 583130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI HANUMANTHAREDDY SAHUKAR, ADV. FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 SERVED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.11.2016 IN RA NO.21 OF 2011 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BALLARI (SITTING AT HOSAPETE) CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.04.2009 IN O.S.NO.37 OF 2004 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AT KUDLIGI, AND DISMISS THE SUIT BY ALLOWING THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:50 RSA No. 100076 of 2017 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 has filed a memo stating that the sole appellant died two years back and no application has been filed for bringing the legal representatives of sole appellant. 2. Therefore, by efflux of time and operation of law, the appeal stands dismissed as abated. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE PMP /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6