IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 CRM-M-21487-2026 Date of Decision: 24.04.2026 PARKASH .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel submits that the challan has already been presented in the present case and the charges are yet to be framed. He further submits that the petitioner is also involved in 17 other cases. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition. 3. Allowed to do so. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. 5. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to move a fresh application for bail after the framing of charges. (H.S.GREWAL) 24.04.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.04.24 14.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh