Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5262 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/37300/2026 · 2026-09-07

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37300 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. On the request of learned counsel for applicant, this matter is being taken up out of turn considering the urgency. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. 3. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Case no.7910 of 2026, arising out Case Crime No.52 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 110 BNS, Police Station- Nibohara, District- Agra, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.3, Agra, including summoning order dated 27.05.2026. 4. On perusal of entire record appended with the instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned summoning order and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 5. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 6. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Prakash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773. 8. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 8, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 37300 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad