Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 52592 (MAD)

Palanisamy v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./1614/2026 · 2026-07-10

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 Palanisamy S/o Mayilsamy, No.61/121, West Street, Samalapuram, Tiruppur. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police O/o The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur. 2. The Inspector Of Police Chevur Police Station, Tiruppur. 3. Sumathi W/o Kumarasen, No.3/122, Asanallipalayam, Vettuvapalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur. 4. Parimala W/o Swaminathan, NO.6/9, Muthugoundanpalayam, Savakattupalayam Via, Olakovil Village, Nambiyur Taluk, Tiruppur. 5. S.Priya W/o Nandagopal, No.5/525, Thikinarai, Thalavadi, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to provide necessary police protection to the safety and security to petitioner and his properties on the basis of his complaint dated 20.06.2026 and to pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.S.Saravanan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking direction to the 2nd respondent to provide necessary police protection to the safety and security to petitioner and his properties on the basis of his complaint dated 20.06.2026. 2. It is seen that the petitioner purchased a property in S.No.191/1 vide Sub Division No.1.00 and 1.44 vide sale deed Document No.6082/2025 and 6083/2025 which was situated in Vettuvapalayam Village, Avinashi Taluk, Tiruppur District by way of registered sale deed vide Document No.6082/2-25 and 6083/2025, however petitioner could not able to take possession of the subject property since the respondents 3 to 5 are objecting the same. Therefore, petitioner ought to have approached his vendor by way of civil suit which was purchased by him. Therefore, police protection cannot be granted to take possession and at the same time, if any cognizable offence is made out by the respondents 3 to 5, the 2nd respondent shall register the FIR. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 10-07-2026 SMA To 1. The Superintendent of Police O/o The Superintendent of Police, Tiruppur. 2. The Inspector Of Police Chevur Police Station, Tiruppur. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA WP Crl. No. 1614 of 2026 10-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis